Hier wäre eine Erklärung

Naclador , Göttingen, Mittwoch, 12.04.2017, 17:24 (vor 3312 Tagen) @ nereus

Moin nereus,

hier ist , was Slate dazu sagt:
"However, it isn't hard to imagine why someone like Cohn might find the idea of Glass-Steagall appealing. Remember that until the financial crisis, Goldman Sachs, where Cohn spent his career, was still a pure investment bank, even though Glass-Steagall had been repealed. It morphed into a bank holding company during 2008 in order to access emergency loans from the Federal Reserve, which put it in the same category as true financial services conglomerates like Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase. But while plebes like you and me can finally open a Goldman Sachs savings account, vanilla consumer banking has never been a big part of its operations. Rebuilding a wall between the boring business of taking deposits and making loans and the more exotic arts of making markets and underwriting probably wouldn't hurt the Vampire Squid much, and might even give it a tentacle up on its competition."
(Quelle: http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2017/04/06/donald_trump_s_top_economic_advisor_supp...

Gruß,
Naclador

--
Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."
Naclador's Corrolary: "Recognize when stupidity is not an adequate explanation."